>I don't know what the studies show re this. It is of course possible >that the women whose competitiveness is most reduced when playing men >are like you being chivalrous towards them, but I doubt it; that >doesn't fit with what I've observed in "life". Maybe they just naturally feel sorry for us brutish, simple men because they know that if we lose to a 'woman' we will be forever shamed in the anals... err... annals. PS> Ah.. so you are one of those that Marlena was speaking of: A or B? nothing >PS> else? Dichotomize, Dichotomize, Dichotomize -- the word's lost all >meaning. > >No. I am not. That's what I am trying to tell you. When I say "I am >torn" I mean (oh hell will I ever get the point across to him?) "I am >torn". I.e., I do not hold either View A or View B. I am ambivalent. I >am not sure. But you are sure you are ambivalent! > >>Who the heck is? It's a continuum. > >I didn't mean, "I am a mix of 'male/female'", I meant, "I am in two >minds about the suggestion that men and women are culturally >different. Really? Wow. How can you even question it? Have you ever MET any men? women? >I don't think "it" is a continuum in the sense that if X (say, >adversarialism) runs from 100 adversarial to 0, there's a point, >around 48-52, where men's and women's scores overlap. Such evidence >as we have supports my doubt. I think you would find that such evidence as we have [whatever that may be] supports my doubts about your doubts. What those are, I can't tell you right now because I have to go and pick up my pussycat from the vet who made him 'not quite as much of a man' yesterday afternoon. >PS> frolicking on a humpday, > >bully for you deliberately stirring it up, harrumphing as I step out, anon ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html