> All in all, the art of code-breaking (and the enigma) is a fascinating one, > > and I wonder where Turing learned to much about it (somewhere in the Home > Counties, I understand). > > Hodges's book was turned into a play with Derek Jacobi playing Turing. > > Cheers, > > JL I posted on this story - The Bletchley Park Story - on the old list: but, without now repeating the details, may I remind everyone that, when approached to get their best men on the job, Oxford in its infinite wisdom decided the cleverest of the bunch were those with a First in Greats/Classics, and put them on the code-cracking task. Only people with their head at least slightly up their arse could fail to see it was a job for logicians and mathmos. As Bryan Magee further explains - 'Confessions of a Philosopher' - because 'philosophy' was then only a subject appended to 'Greats', this kind of deluded self-importance of the 'literary man' - as against the 'scientific' - seeped its way into 'Oxbridge philosophy'. Maybe JL, for example, can - Wittgenstein excepted - name the philosophers in this school who had more than a passing acquaintance with 'science' (Strawson has, I think, confessed his ignorance, notwithstanding his confidence that he has something interesting and analytic to say about 'induction')? (And Wittgenstein's philosophy of science is, of course - in Popperian terms, quite mistaken. Very badly mistaken, and largely 'positivist' - insofar as any clear meaning can be attached to what he says, of course). Donal Expecting to be passed over in silence Again ___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html