The Boston Brahmin Does Philosophy From this online site, I read: wapedia.mobi/en/Harvard_University "Nevertheless, Harvard became the bastion of a distinctly Protestant elite — the so-called Boston Brahmin class — and continued to be so well into the 20th century. The social milieu of 1880s Harvard is depicted in Owen Wister's Philosophy 4, which contrasts the character and demeanor of two undergraduates who "had colonial names (Rogers, I think, and Schuyler)" with that of their tutor, one Oscar Maironi, whose "parents had come over in the steerage." ("Bertie's and Billy's parents owned town and country houses in New York. ----- I believe, but then, what's the wapedia, the passage is slightly incorrect, and self-contradictory. Billy Rogers and Bertie Schulyer had "parents [who] owned town and country houses in New York" and today ("1901") _http://www.fullbooks.com/Philosophy-4-A-Story-of-Harvard-University.html_ (http://www.fullbooks.com/Philosophy-4-A-Story-of-Harvard-University.html) "To-day Bertie [Schulyer] ] is treasurer of the New Amsterdam Trust Company, in Wall Street; Billy [Rogers] is superintendent of passenger traffic of the New York and Chicago Air Line. --- So the "Athenaeum" Club would not be _their_ thing; Boston Brahmin waxes provincial to the New Yorker, I tend to perceive (if 'waxes' is the word). Woodfield, the professor, would possibly be Brahmin, only _educators_ did not necessarily _count_. In fact, I don't think the Boston brahmin needs _do_ philosophy, and _doing_ it (as William James partly did it, because he was part-time psychology) contradicts the feeling? Cheers, JL **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)