[lit-ideas] Re: The Baby and the Waterboard

  • From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:13:02 -0400

Judith: "Context"? Is your argument really that Brits can't condemn the US for torturing given that some IRA prisoners were tortured? Bizarre.


No, context means context. M-W 11 defines context as "the interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs : ENVIRONMENT, SETTING *the historical context of the war*"

Hence mere finger-pointing turns to examination of the broader context, i.e., that many nations torture. From this vantage one may condemn the US actions. Otherwise one is condemning from a false position of moral superiority. With context acknowledged, one's criticism carries more weight.
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: