> As for British prison hospitality offered to captured IRA > agents/terrorists, there are plenty of stories about that. > My intention was to suggest context. "Context"? Is your argument really that Brits can't condemn the US for torturing given that some IRA prisoners were tortured? Bizarre. Incidentally Same as "Argies," a neutral > term. I wouldn't call it neutral. I'd never heard it before the Falklands War. --- On Fri, 24/4/09, Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: The Baby and the Waterboard > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Friday, 24 April, 2009, 9:51 PM > JLS: Are you implicating that all IRA members in prison are > _dead_ hence it's > only 'Brits', as you derogatorily put it, who may > 'reflect'? > > "Brits" ranks with "Yanks" for me, that > is, a neutral term. Same as "Argies," a neutral > term. Are you offended by reference to "Argies"? > These terms -- Brits, Yanks, Argies -- are diminutives, and > seem, to me anyway, to suggest a collegial respect and > friendliness. To my mind, derogation involves imputing > negative characteristics, like "Frog" for French. > > As for British prison hospitality offered to captured IRA > agents/terrorists, there are plenty of stories about that. > My intention was to suggest context. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html