[lit-ideas] Taheri and the Leftists

  • From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lawrencehelm1.post@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:03:24 -0700

In reading everything I could lay my hands on about Taheri's breaking of the
story about Obama's perfidiousness in Iraq, I noticed that every leftist who
dealt with the story began by demonizing Taheri.   

 

I had some familiarity with Taheri before this fracas began.  I read his
Holy Terror, Inside the World of Islamic Terrorism, 1987 and Nest of Spies,
1988, but I read them a long time ago and they were written an even longer
time ago; so I didn't initially assume that Taheri was correct in regard to
what he wrote about Obama attempting to influence the Iraqi Foreign Minister
Zebari.  I wasn't rushing to judgment, but the Leftists were.  After
vilifying Tehari they refused to believe he had done anything wrong in Iraq,
and when I didn't immediately agree with them, they vilified me.  

 

I read Taheri's article several times.  The Leftists didn't.  They kept
referring to what it said, but kept getting it wrong.   They didn't seem to
notice that the critical element in Taheri's article wasn't his own history,
but his reporting of what the Foreign Minister told him.   I knew very
little about Taheri's background, but I could read and I did have a grasp of
logic; so the real issue wasn't the Left's vilification but whether Foreign
Minister Zebari really did say what Taheri said he said.

 

The left heaped so much abuse on Taheri that it was hard to keep track of
the real issues, but I persevered.  I waited to see if Zebari would
repudiate Taheri's words - if he would hold a press conference and deny that
he had told Taheri any such thing.  Time passed and Zebari kept silent.   He
issued no such denial.

 

Well, okay, so Taheri was accurate in what he said. What then?  What did
this mean? Taheri's focus was on Obama's duplicitousness.  In the past Obama
urged time tables to get the troops home as quickly as possible.  He said
the Iraq war was lost and wanted to get our troops out of there.  But in his
recent visit to Iraq he conceded, more or less without saying so, that the
war was won and saw no need to hurry the troops home.  In fact he thought it
would be good if Iraq kept them there until after the election.

 

Pardon Taheri for being a cynic, but he assumed Obama was intent upon
keeping the troops in Iraq for political reasons.  Much of his campaign had
been built upon the idea that the war in Iraq was a mistake and was
unwinnable.   But now the Iraqis were doing so well they said they could
begin to handle things on their own and wanted us to draw down our troop
presence.  It is okay, they said, for the American troops to go home.   But
Obama (inadvertently conceded the opposite of what he had previously argued
in his campaigned), now wanted to keep things as they were until after the
election.  If troops start going home before the election, it would look
like the war in Iraq was a success, that the Iraqis were better off now than
under Saddam Hussein.  It would be better to wait until after the election,
Obama told Zebari, before sending troops home.  Zebari seems to have been
offended.  Troops should go home based on Iraqi's time table, not America's.

 

All that was pretty clear when I read the reports, but when I turned away to
see what the Leftists were saying, I read more vilification and demonization
of Taheri.  They persisted in thinking, I suppose, that vilifying Taheri was
going to influence the facts, but the facts remained.  In an interesting
development, Obama's camp denied Taheri's charge but in discussing what
Obama did say, they inadvertently admitted that what Taheri said was
accurate.   Were they just so inexperienced that they (1) didn't understand
what Taheri wrote, and (2) didn't recognize that Obama had done anything
wrong?

 

Leftists will persist, I suppose, in believing Taheri's reputation is shot
plenty of Leftists have shot at it.   From my standpoint any writer so
demonized by the Left is someone I want to read more of.  I just checked
Amazon.com and ordered one of his earlier books I hadn't read, now out of
print.  I ordered an "ex libra" copy of
<http://www.amazon.com/Spirit-Allah-Khomeini-Islamic-Revolution/dp/091756104
X/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221674122&sr=1-3> The Spirit of Allah:
Khomeini and the Islamic Revolution, 1986


I also preordered, The Persian Night: Iran Under the Khomeinist Revolution.



 

Lawrence Helm

Other related posts:

  • » [lit-ideas] Taheri and the Leftists