> [Original Message] > From: Eric <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 4/2/2006 4:47:52 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Sustained Incongruencies > > ck: The more sustained incongruencies in one's > personal life, the more > hypocrisy and neurosis. > > Are you advocating for the Karen Horney reading in > _Neurosis and Human Growth_ that the tension > between the real self and the ideal self drives > neurosis? > > Surely that's not the same as the ability to hold > contradictory views in mind and suspend judgment, > the so-called "negative capability"? Rather the > incongruence in neurosis have to do with self > concept and forms of desire. (E.g., "I am a great > painter who will start painting as soon as I get > time off from my Wal-Mart clerk job.") > This is bothering me. Further to my other post, it's a matter of degree. So yes, lying to one's self (I'm a great painter but I have to work at Wal-Mart) probably would qualify as false self. False selfs are a self protective thing. The false self in this case might be externally imposed (my son the great painter, when the son feels like a sham). It's very hard to make absolute distinctions. In a case such as this, I'd be inclined to think the person's making excuses might be as much a form of submerged anger as it is protective, more a boundary issue, a way to keep mother out of his face. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html