Well, in Ballybunyan when there's a full moon they say condoms work better. --- On Thu, 11/8/11, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Alla Grice, but less pedantically, I would ask for > some clarification. What follows from JLS bears on the 'Beyond Signalling Lies Nothing' thread, which arose from JLS's claim that for Grice there is nothing in language further than signalling. For the "clarification" sought here is surely more than signalling? Also Grice's reference to "Truth" in his "Maxim of Quality" is surely a reference to "Truth" in a sense beyond mere signalling (for the measure of 'signalling', its worth or value, lies in its effectiveness - and this is only contingently related to the truth of its content [indeed, in many cases it is the measure of the effectiveness of a signal that it misleads, and thus that its content as 'description' is false; this kind of misleading signal violates Grices "Maxim of Quality: Truth" but it violates no 'Maxim of Quality: Effectiveness' as it pertains to the signalling function of language]. So perhaps we should, having waited patiently, now receive "clarification" from JLS as to whether Grice seriously contends that language is limited to signalling and how this is to be defended against the obvious objections, including Popper's? Donal London ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html