Courtesy of Grand McCracken at http://www.cultureby.com/trilogy/2008/12/bunges-symptoms-of-truth.html > What matters now that post-modernism doesn't? Now that we have escaped the > wrecking crew, how shall we proceed? > > We could do worse that say that we want to author "propositions" about the > world. And if this is what we want to do, I suggest we say that on balance > these propositions would be better if they satisfied Bunge's "symptoms of > truth." > > According to Bunge, propositions should be: > > 1. exact, so that no unnecessary ambiguity exists > 2. economical, so that we oblige us to make the minimum number of > assumptions > 3. mutually consistent, so that no assertion contradicts another > 4. externally consistent, so that it conforms to what we know about other > things in the world > 5. unified, so that assertions are organized in a manner that subsumes the > specific within the general, unifying where possible, discriminating when > necessary > 6. powerful, so that it explains as much of the data as possible without > sacrificing accuracy > 7. fertile, so that it suggests new ideas and opportunities for insight > > I am not saying we do not want to care about post modern topics (messy > cultures, multiple selves, destablized elites, etc.). But clearly, we are > now obliged to distinguish between post modern topics and methods. The > methods have been a disaster. They have cost us knowledge. > > Dumbing down was something to be feared, after all. But it came not from > popular culture, but the intellectuals and academics who appointed > themselves our guardians. > > References > > Bunge, Mario. 1961. The weight of simplicity in the construction and > assaying of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science. 28 (2): 120-149. > -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wordworks.jp/