How many of you guys remember where you were the evening of Nov 4, 2004? I was in my living room with my husband, watching the election results coming in on TV. I remember my husband gasping, "My God -- the country's bleeding out." On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Judith Evans <judith.evans001@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > but YOU, ma'am, are the one attributing "buffoon" >> status to imaginary Americans who happened to be given >> rustic names and who were expecting mass culture >> instead of dueling unobjectionables. >> > > You, Eric, said > > If Obama makes this assumption about everything substantial in a debate -- >>>> i.e., that a good portion of his audience is cut off, hasn't a clue, was >>>> busy in Vegas or on Vision Quest, is out to lunch, had the "do not disturb" >>>> sign hanging from their sensory deprivation tank -- how does he explain >>>> that >>>> this same group is in the (real or TV) audience listening to him speak >>>> during a Presidential Debate? >>>> >>> > Why would they be there? Maybe they took a wrong turn on their way to the >>>> mall? >>>> >>> > > apparently misinterpreting my > > Judith: "some in the audience might not know where they were and 'how all >>>>> the country was ready to come together' etc., as they might have been >>>>> (like >>>>> me) somewhat cut off from political events at that time" >>>>> >>>> > 'buffoon' seemed not unreasonable to me > > I then explained my 'like me' 'cut off' and so on > > As for "coping with serious problems," I did offer you >> respect for that circumstance. >> > > > But that was not my point, my point was that *some in the audience* might > have been in a situation like mine -- and indeed, worse: my situation that > day was not in any way desperate, it simply did not conduce to, as it were, > taking the nation's pulse, to taking part in a pulling together, etc.. > > However it must have >> evaporated when the rustics were imagined >> > > Your imagining, Eric, passed off as an assumption of Obama's. You said: > > > >>> "Say, Wendy, this isn't 'Are You Smarter than a > >> Fifth Grader?' Who are those serious guys in suits?" >>>> >>> >>> "You're right, Billy Bob. Dang blast that Mapquest!" > > not I. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:57 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Some of you may remember ... ueber-gaffe > > > Judith: Your suggestion that all such people are >> buffoons who switched the TV on by accident, when they >> may have been coping with serious problems, is really >> unpleasant and foolish, too. >> >> >> Hey, I know you're not one to be out-snarked, Judith, >> but YOU, ma'am, are the one attributing "buffoon" >> status to imaginary Americans who happened to be given >> rustic names and who were expecting mass culture >> instead of dueling unobjectionables. "Buffoon" is your >> projection, your read-in, your stereotype. Own it. >> >> As for "coping with serious problems," I did offer you >> respect for that circumstance. However it must have >> evaporated when the rustics were imagined. But finis, as you say. >> >> All the best to you and yours, >> Eric >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, >> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1722 - Release >> Date: 13/10/2008 07:50 >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > -- Julie Krueger Visit www.VoteForChange.com. Register to vote and help spread the word.