Because Williams has to correspond to 'he' and not to 'she'. :) Okay, the first example is really just a joke, but compare my example 2 with Gettier's example 1. As far as I can see, the structure is same. O.K. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In ex2, it depends on what you take the scope of the det to be (the > ‘the’ in the woman in paris) > > In ex1 I fail to understand what Williams’ sex dos to the claim you made. > > In general Gettier examples are statable without any use of those, e.g. as > in x knows that p, if p- q or p, q & not p. hence x both knows p and cannot > know that p, since he’d know p & not p. reminder K is under closure by > connectives. > > > > > > > > *From:* lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Omar Kusturica > *Sent:* 13 March 2015 11:24 > *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [lit-ideas] Some Gettier examples > > > > Example 1 > > > > Smith, Jones and Williams are having a job interview. Smith has been > assured by the interviewer that Jones will get the job. On the basis of > this, Smith has formed a justified belief in the proposition that he will > get the job. It turns out that the job has gone to Williams instead. > "Unbeknownst to Smith," Williams too is male. > > > > > > Example 2 > > > > Smith met Celia and saw that she had a new hair colour, red. The next day > he called her on the mobile and she told him that she is in Paris. On the > basis of this, Smith formed a justified belief that the woman who is in > Paris has red hair. In fact, Celia lied to him and she wasn't in Paris at > all. However, "unbeknownst to Smith" Genevieve, who lives in Paris, has red > hair. > > > > **************************** > > Are these really examples of "justified true belief that is not > knowledge", or perhaps there is something fishy about the way the > propositions 'he will get the job' and 'the woman who is in Paris has red > hair' are formulated ? > > > > O.K. >