My so-called almeer mata having triumphed via its College Form with its spartan "about 400" against the Mancunian "almost 40,000" in BBC's 'University Challenge' (btw, was shifting supposedly kiln-dried oak for firewood yesterday with someone with a doctorate from Oxford and it incidentally came up that neither of us knew where the fuck Corpus Christi is (answers not required: we could goggle, but our superior education tells us what-the-fuck), here's a question... Anyway, thought it be a maybe good question (it's the question in the subject-box in case you've really lost the plot by now). Might even be approached as an old-style Oxbridge Entrance Exam question (JLS, don't wet your knickers). Phil Btw, if you watch on BBC-i-player u can c the whole thing was rigged Yes By the questions The pattern was more-or-less to advantage a certain kind of scientific knowledge early on and then switch to a certain kind of humanities knowlege later But then, as was said when i was young,'Measuring intelligence by tests is like measuring digestion by turd-length' (Goethe) In Popperian terms:- no-one on the programme advanced an interesting or important theory, and didn't ever need to iot win (Sorry I'm Phil, That should have read "In Wgn. terms"...) Just knowledge they show (of fairly predicated kinds), and their ability to make connections thereby Bearing in mind that creative 'genuises' like Einstein or Mozart may have had a relatively low IQ or UC mark as conventionally judged And Popper was referenced one-nil more that Wittgenstein in the series' questions Anyway, back to _the_ question.. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html