<<frogs falling out of the sky (Julie, this is scripture, correct?)>> This is textually correct, however there is a wide variety of interpretations out there depending on your exegetic/hermeneutic/literary and cultural and historical criticism approach. Some more sensible people understand that the Bible is a group of hugely redacted texts deriving from centuries of oral tradition varying in genre from myth to history to poetry, etc. The fundamentalists alone insist on interpreting everything in ridiculously literal form -- 7 days equals 7 24-hour periods of time, myth = fiction and the Bible is not fictitious, etc. So depending on the Christian or Jew or scholar you talk to the frogs can be symbolic, the frog tale can be moralistic, the frog tale can be mythical but telling a Truth though not factual, etc. << Also for Julie, isn't the Apocalypse preceded by the Antichrist? >> Yes. << Is the Antichrist here yet?>> I'm not answering that in light of the Patriot Act. Who knows who's reading these syllables. << Bill Clinton, maybe? >> Nah. He was immoral but benign and in some ways benificent. <<It can't be OBL because the Antichrist is an imposter, am I wrong? >> You got it. In spades. Julie Krueger ========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Sex with Chickens Date: 3/17/05 8:29:59 A.M. Central Standard Time From: _aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) , _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: You'll get no argument from me. They have us beat, plus, as you say, this stuff is widespread throughout the Arab world, where we can still shudder at it. I wouldn't be too surprised, though, if regular evangelicals (half the country) didn't think this stuff is too weird. After all, evangelicals do preach women as inferior, the world only as 6,000 years old and so on Regular evangelicals believe in corporal punishment of children (wives too?), frogs falling out of the sky (Julie, this is scripture, correct?), and a general us/them mentality. Plus they like to be on the giving end of thought control, like the FLDS. Also for Julie, isn't the Apocalypse preceded by the Antichrist? Is the Antichrist here yet? Bill Clinton, maybe? It can't be OBL because the Antichrist is an imposter, am I wrong? For Marlene, what does it say about the U.S. that the moderates iin this country have to form a coalition? Andy Amago > [Original Message] > From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 3/17/2005 12:10:52 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sex with Chickens > > Andy, writing about the one-M-too-many Mormons: Makes sex with chickens > look rather ordinary by comparison. > > Going back to my source of the chicken story, _Reading Lolita in Tehran, > the author does have a long section on the mistreatment of women and on > women younger than the fictional Lolita having to marry 50+ year old > guys. Difference being, the Mor(m)ons are an American cult and the > practice described in Nafisi's book is widespread throughout the Islamic > Republic. > > C'mon Andy, you gotta admit the sex-with-chicken rules are funnier, > especially if you imagine stonefacd Ayatollah Khomenei demonstrating > them in an educational video. > > Eric > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html