Eric: "...so far outside the bounds of manly conduct in war as to seem inhuman. How quaint! (Sixty years later nuclear missiles aimed at all major population centers.)" You anticipated my reaction. : ) Mike Geary On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 6/10/2010 5:38 PM, John Wager wrote: > >> Now it seems the point is to document how bad you are, how much of a >> "jackass" (recent TV show) you are. >> > > Read Teddy Roosevelt's _The Rough Riders_ a while ago. The comparison with > today's attitudes was vertiginous and a bit nauseating. > > Gatling guns in those battles too. The Spanish had the advantage of home > ground, provisions, and the latest weaponry. While the Spanish had smokeless > rounds, the terribly disorganized Americans had old Civil War equipment -- > smoke from gunshots giving away one's position -- and hardly any food. > > Particularly interesting was TR's account of the Spanish snipers, who > deliberately killed doctors and ministers attending the wounded -- the > single moment in the narrative where TR drops his calmly balanced style and > expresses outrage. He assembled a group of backwoodsmen, sheriffs, and > "Harvard hunters". They were sent out to hunt the snipers and in three days > had killed them all without suffering any casualties. It's a moment of > satisfaction actually, since snipers are "supposed" to shoot soldiers, > particularly officers, but to shoot doctors and chaplains, in the > sensibility established by the narrative, is so far outside the bounds of > manly conduct in war as to seem inhuman. How quaint! (Sixty years later > nuclear missiles aimed at all major population centers.) > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >