They themselves say the findings are controversial and far from clear ... To answer your question, yes, forget about it. > [Original Message] > From: Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 9/8/2005 11:52:37 PM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Sapient Hominids. . . Just forget about it? > > http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050909/ap_on_sc/brain_evolutio n > > Genes Show Signs Brain Still Evolving > > By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer 1 hour, 14 minutes ago > > WASHINGTON - The human brain may still be evolving. So suggests new > research that tracked changes in two genes thought to help regulate > brain growth, changes that appeared well after the rise of modern > humans 200,000 years ago. > > That the defining feature of humans ? our large brains ? continued > to evolve as recently as 5,800 years ago, and may be doing so today, > promises to surprise the average person, if not biologists. > > "We, including scientists, have considered ourselves as sort of the > pinnacle of evolution," noted lead researcher Bruce Lahn, a > University of Chicago geneticist whose studies appear in Friday's > edition of the journal Science. > > "There's a sense we as humans have kind of peaked," agreed Greg > Wray, director of Duke University's Center for Evolutionary > Genomics. "A different way to look at is it's almost impossible for > evolution not to happen." > > Still, the findings also are controversial, because it's far from > clear what effect the genetic changes had or if they arose when > Lahn's "molecular clock" suggests ? at roughly the same time period > as some cultural achievements, including written language and the > development of cities. > > Lahn and colleagues examined two genes, named microcephalin and > ASPM, that are connected to brain size. If those genes don't work, > babies are born with severely small brains, called microcephaly. > > Using DNA samples from ethnically diverse populations, they > identified a collection of variations in each gene that occurred > with unusually high frequency. In fact, the variations were so > common they couldn't be accidental mutations but instead were > probably due to natural selection, where genetic changes that are > favorable to a species quickly gain a foothold and begin to spread, > the researchers report. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html