LH:
St. Exupery was cruising along perhaps day-dreaming, and Rippertspots him, comes up behind him and shoots him down. Reminds me of some fishI speared in my diving days.
I'm not sure why this last sentence tickles me so much, but it does. Mike Geary Memphis----- Original Message ----- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 8:36 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery
David, I couldn't find the NYT article you refer to, but I found some otherarticles: The Wikipedia article describes the P-38 St. Exupery flew in 1944 as "war weary." The following article says that Rippert just recently discovered that one of his 28 kills was St. Exupery. As to how he did it in his Messerschmidt: 'The fliers clashed in the skies over southern France in July 1944. "He was below me," said Rippert. "I sawhis markings, manoeuvred myself behind him and shot him down. If I had known it was Saint-Exupery, I would never have shot him down. I loved his books. I am shocked and sorry. Who knows what other great books he would have gone onto write?" http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_art icle_id=536468&in_page_id=1811 Here is a more complete story: http://galliawatch.blogspot.com/2008/03/mystery-solved.html If St Exupery was on a reconnaissance mission, he may not have been goingfast. Rippert's description doesn't make it sound as though St. Exupery waspaying attention. It doesn't sound as though they were engaged in a dog-fight. > Lawrence Helm San Jacinto -----Original Message-----From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David Ritchie Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:22 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Saint Exupery Some of you may be following the news about Saint Exupery--NYT, April 11 etc. The short version is that a plane has been found, a German says he shot the author down and he's now writing a book about this. Wikipedia has an up-to-date version of events. I thought it might be fun to have Lawrence and Bill Ball and maybe Robert Paul and others wade in on the matter. Here's my reading of the situation. The puzzle in my mind as I read the article over lunch was that the NYT didn't mention what kind of plane the German was flying. Why is that a puzzle? When I was at the Evergreen Air museum recently, a cursory reading of the display notes showed the kind of aircraft that Saint Exupery was flying--a P38--outpacing the German fighters on show in that museum by a hundred miles an hour. So my question was, how did the German catch him and shoot him down? The article says that Saint E was not in good physical shape, and old (44!), and that his evasive moves weren't very good. But a hundred miles an hour of extra speed is a lot to make up! There are clues online. First, in the Wikipedia article on Saint E, there's mention that the German fellow may not be quite what he seems. Also there's no "combat damage" to Saint E.s plane. But elsewhere I found that the French may have been given P38s that were a hundred miles an hour slower than the American ones, sans turbochargers, and that some P38s were notoriously hard to control once they went into a dive. Do I conclude that the German may not have shot him down, but he might have forced him into the water? David Ritchie, Portland, Oregon ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html