[lit-ideas] Re: Saddam was... innocent?

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:48:57 -0800

The trial was still ongoing. The idea of "declaring him guilty" on one item and hanging him before concluding the trial is a legal farce.


Normally, it's trial, evidence, summation of arguments, jury deliberation, appeals, sentencing, and execution. But they skipped everything and went straight to the execution. That saved a lot of bother, no? All that tedious talk!

yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Phil Enns" <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:15 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Saddam was... innocent?


Andreas Ramos wrote:

This is too extremely funny. Today, all charges against Saddam have been
dropped.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2536892,00.html

As I thought, the trial had not ended. Saddam was dragged out of his cell
and lynched. The trial was still ongoing. So, with him dead, the judges had
no choice but to end his trial, which means Saddam is now legally innocent."



Read the article again.


Phil Enns
Glen Haven, NS
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.7/619 - Release Date: 1/7/2007


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: