[lit-ideas] Re: Ruth Barcan Marcus 1921-2012

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:20:29 -0400 (EDT)

McEvoy was  quoting from Neale's quotation in the NYT obit of Ruth 
Charlotte Barcan Marcus.  

This from
 
Menzel, Christopher, "Actualism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of  Philosophy 
(Fall 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =  
<http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/actualism/>. 
 

-- the formulae therein should relate.

 
‘It is possible that there is an x such that x is an Alien’

◊∃xAx.



‘Something is possibly an alien’

∃x◊Ax 


Joseph Ratzinger (i.e., the Pope at the time of this writing...) could  
have had a son who could have become a priest.

◊∃x(Sxp ∧ ◊Px)



The K schema, which asserts that if a conditional is necessary, then if the 
 antecedent is necessary, so is the consequent:

□(φ→ψ) → (□φ→□ψ)


The T schema, which asserts that a formula true in every possible world is  
simply true:

□φ → φ

The 5 schema, which asserts that if a formula φ is possible, then it is  
necessarily the case that it is possible:

◊φ → □◊φ

The so-called Barcan [Schema] 
∀x□φ → □∀xφ 
◊∃xφ → ∃x◊φ.



---
∀x□∃y(y=x)
The Converse Barcan Schema
□∀xφ → ∀x□φ
Given an  explicit predicate to express existence, the actualist principle 
A can be  expressed formally as follows:



∀xE!x.
"But we can say more. For the actualist position isn't that it's  just an 
accident that there are no mere Necessarily, everything there is is  actual.
□∀xE!x.
x is contingent =df ◊E!x ∧ ◊~E!x

"Actualists and possibilists alike, then, generally agree that there are  
contingent beings."



∃x(◊E!x ∧ ◊~E!x)
"Actualists often simply define the existence predicate  ‘E!’ in terms of 
the existential quantifier thus:



E!Def: E!x =df ∃y(y=x).
∀x□E!x.

□∀x□∃y(y=x).
□∀x□E!x.
Converse Barcan Schema (revisited)
□∀xE!x →  ∀x□E!x
and so on.

Refs cited in the Stanford entry, by Barcan Marcus: two:
 
Barcan, Ruth Charlotte, 1946, “A Functional Calculus of First Order Based  
on Strict Implication,” Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11: 1–16.
Marcus, Ruth  Charlotte Barcan, 1986, “Possibilia and Possible Worlds,” 
Grazer  Philosophische Studien, R. Haller (ed.), 25/26 (1985/1986): 107–33.
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
---
 
Appendix A:
 
Festschrift for Barcan Marcus:
 
_Modality, Morality and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth  Barcan Marcus_ 
(http://www.amazon.com/Modality-Morality-Belief-Essays-Barcan/dp/0521440823/ref=
sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1332256526&sr=8-3)  by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana  
Raffman and Nicholas Asher (Hardcover - Jan 27, 1995) 
 
Appendix B: 

Ruth Barcan Marcus: essays in "Modalities"  (Oxford):

 
_1  Modalities and Intensional Languages_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-1)
 

 
_Appendix  1A: Discussion_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-appendix-1)
 

 
_Appendix  1B: Smullyan on Modality and Description_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-appendix-2)
 

 
_2  Iterated Deontic Modalities_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-2)
 

 
_3  Essentialism in Modal Logic_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-3)
 

 
_4  Essential Attribution_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-4)
 

 
_Appendix  4A: Strict Implication, Deducibility, and the Deduction Theorem_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-97
80195096576-appendix-3) 

 
_5  Quantification and Ontology_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-5)
 

 
_6  Classes, Collections, Assortments, and Individuals_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-
6) 

 
_7  Does the Principle of Substitutivity Rest on a Mistake?_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-cha
pter-7) 

 
_8  Nominalism and the Substitutional Quantifier_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-8)
 

 
_9  Moral Dilemmas and Consistency_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-9)
 

 
_10  Rationality and Believing the Impossible_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-10)
 

 
_11  Spinoza and the Ontological Proof_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-11)
 

 
_12  On Some Post‐1920s Views of Russell on Particularity, Identity, and  
Individuation_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-12)
 

 
_13  Possibilia and Possible Worlds_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chapter-13)
 

 
_14  A Backward Look at Quine's Animadversions on Modalities_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-ch
apter-14) 

 
_15  Some Revisionary Proposals About Belief and Believing_ 
(http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195096576.001.0001/acprof-9780195096576-chap
ter-15) 

 

Other related posts: