--- Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > *These are interesting observations, especially the > last one about the Soviets seeing it in their > interest to have a strong neighbor. It seems lost to many that the Soviet position really wasn't that aggressive towards Western Europe. As a general point, any peace at any cost may not be worthwhile, but peace is still very valuable. Ultimately, you have to get along with your neighbors and if we are talking nations, your neighbors are not going anywhere. If we want to draw parallels between Finland and Soviet Union and Palestinians and Israel, and as I already said I am not sure we should as the situations were in many important ways different, the pre-war situation in Finland may be interesting. Anti-Communist paramilitaries won the civil war against the Communists in 1918 in Finland, but effectively disarming them proved difficult. Many went on to fight against the Communists in Russia (under UK flag actually), and in 30's an Anti-Communist (I am somewhat hesitant to call them Fascists, although some definitely were) coup was avoided. While it in retrospect it was unlikely to succeed, it certainly didn't make the Soviets feel any safer. Given that and close ties to Germany, German invention was crucial in the civil war, Soviets had some reasons to fear that Finland would be used as a base for a German attack. The Finnish government would not have allowed it, but the failure on Finnish part was to convince Soviets of that and lack-luster efforts to suppress the militaries. Now to Palestine. Their weapon of choice, and not that they have much choices, is suicide bombers. Tactics like this are difficult for the Israelis as there are few effective counter-measures, because the terrorists are decentralized, act in small groups and keep distance to Palestinian leadership. But controlling this military wing is difficult for Fatah and Hamas political wing precisely because of the same reasons. This leads to a situation where the Israelis reasonably ask whether talking to the political leadership is useful at all, what is the point of having peace talks with someone who can not deliver peace? This would lead to the conclusion that the Palestinian authority has to take control of the militants before any progress is made. And I believe this has to happen before Israelis see a healthy Palestine as in their interest. The current Palestine position as I understand is that the occupation has to end first, and while it may be justified on moral grounds it is politically unrealistic. Good politics is about doing good, not being right in principle. > And, Finland was > still > a fairly large country with a scarce population, > which > could absorb refugees, while the West Bank and Gaza > are small patches of territory which are already > heavily overpopulated. Look at Singapore for example, there is in principle no such thing as an overpopulated territory. > > There is also something of a moral difference, > namely > Finland made the mistake of joining forces with the > Nazi Germany from 1941. to 1944. (though admittedly > somewhat understandable given the circumstances), > and > so was forced to sign the Paris treaty accepting the > loss of territory. > Choosing between Stalin and Hitler that is, the leadership at the time was pretty much resigned to their fate. Personally, the military commander Mannerheim despised Hitler. For another moral compromise, the small Finnish Jewish minority fought (and by all accounts well) in the Finnish army. Yes, they were torn, but the Finnish state wasn't anti-semitic and ultimately they chose the country no matter who much they hated its allies. And the border issue is dead and buried, it not like we lack land here. Cheers, Teemu Helsinki, Finland __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html