Yeah, but that was before the Soviets turned the game into a science. The theoretical knowledge that was available to Lasker or Nimzovitch was probably inferior to that possessed by an average FIDE master today. (Or an average chess program.) As for Alekhine's professional discipline, it is said that he used to defeat a bottle of vine at breakfast. (Something I could sympathize with.) O.K. --- Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>Maybe that was the place to live in, Eric. > > Probably the 1920s, in Europe or America, would be > the best > place to set my chess time machine. Lasker was still > around > and you also had the innovators like Reti and > Nimzovitch. > > It would have been something to see Capablanca play > Alekhine, no? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $420k for $1,399/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html