I wonder if anyone thought of publishing Heidegger's used toilet paper. O.K. On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:46 PM, <cblists@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > For those who want a more nuanced discussion of the publication of > Heidegger's 'Black Notebooks' and their relevance in assessing Heidegger's > importance as a philosopher I recommend reading the following three > articles (from which I quote short excerpts): > > Bernard-Henry Levy's "Why read Heidegger?" > > "The real question [is] not to recall for the umpteenth time that this > great philosopher was also a real Nazi. > > "Rather it was to ask what can and should be done today about the living > paradox, the terrifying oxymoron, of an individual about whom we cannot > even say, as we could about Céline, that he had two separate faces. We > cannot do that with Heidegger because in the same works, the same > sentences, often the same word, the man appears as a lofty philosopher and > as a purveyor of infamy. > > "Should we just forget him? ... Jump at finally having a good reason not > to have to struggle with one of the most arduous and complex of > contemporary philosophers? > > "I don't think so. ..." > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bernardhenri-levy/why-read-heidegger_b_6570986.html > > Jonathan Ree's "In defence of Heidegger: You do not have to admire a > philosopher personally to admire his work" > > "I think that those who say that because [Heidegger] was anti-Semitic we > should not read his philosophy show a deep ignorance about the whole > tradition of writing and reading philosophy. The point about philosophy is > not that it offers an anthology of opinions congenial to us, which we can > dip into to find illustrations of what you might call greeting card > sentiments. Philosophy is about learning to be aware of problems in your > own thinking where you might not have suspected them. It offers its readers > an intellectual boot camp, where every sentence is a challenge, to be > negotiated with care. The greatest philosophers may well be wrong: the > point of recognising them as great is not to subordinate yourself to them, > but to challenge yourself to work out exactly where they go wrong." > > > http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/arts-and-books/in-defence-of-heidegger#.UyMRutxIZbz > > Richard Polt and Gregory Fried in conversation with Thomas Sheehan: "no > one can jump over his own shadow" > > "RP & GF: The three volumes of 'Black Notebooks' ... leave no reasonable > doubt that Heidegger had anti-Semitic attitudes. And his public statements, > even into the 1940s, indicated that he supported ... the Nazi regime and > its war efforts. How do you see this affecting his philosophy? > > "TS: Heidegger’s attempt to launder his cultural pessimism and revanchist > nationalism through his “metaphysical history” of the downfall of the West > is a complete failure and should be recognized as such. This includes, most > saliently and infamously, his undeniable anti-Semitism and Nazism. > > "In my opinion, the attempts of Heideggerians to 'explain' his > anti-Semitism via exculpatory qualifications (e.g., 'he wasn’t a biological > anti-Semite like the Nazis') are abject strategies of avoidance, a > desperate refusal to accept the obvious. The question, rather, is whether > his deep cultural anti-Semitism, along with his craven allegiance to > Hitler, hemorrhage into the core of his philosophy. > > "Some, like the indefatigable but philosophically challenged Emmanuel > Faye, insist that Heidegger was a Nazi even before he was born and that > from beginning to end his philosophy was nothing but an effort—in Faye’s > words—'to introduce Nazism into philosophy.' > > "I argue ... that the essential core of Heidegger’s philosophy was in > place by the end of 1930 and that it is in no way tainted by his later > Nazism or his abiding anti-Semitism." > > http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/no-one-can-jump-over-his-own-shadow/ > > Chris Bruce, > in Kiel, Germany > > P.S. Please note that 'recommend reading' is not semantically equivalent > to 'agree uncritically with the entire contents of'. > > - CB------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >