Below is an excerpt from an AP article. Note the headline: Anti-Terror Bill Worries Liberties Groups Reading the phrase "Liberties Groups," evokes more than the ACLU. "Liberties Groups" sounds like a bunch of hippies who take liberties, libertines, and liberals. These "Liberties Groups" are "worried" by the bill. They worry, are concerned, perhaps they worry too much, and in their worry are made trivial. Liberties Groups worry too much. They are just "Groups" anyway and their worry is not that important. After all, the headline doesn't say that the new bill worries Constitutional scholars, the only people worrying are a bunch of effeminate, probably decadent Liberties Groups. What are they worries about? Why, an "anti-terror" bill. How silly of these decadent groups to worry about that! They should worry about terrorism, shouldn't they? Perhaps the headline, NEW BILL MAY THREATEN AMERICAN FREEDOM AND PRIVACY RIGHTS, was just too direct, and didn't have the trivializing effect the corporate media wanted. Eric _____ Anti-Terror Bill Worries Liberties Groups By CURT ANDERSON (c) The Associated Press WASHINGTON (AP) - People indicted on terror charges will have a much harder time getting free on bail under a provision in the new intelligence bill. The provision also broadens the government's authority to spy on terror suspects. Critics say the enforcement powers, attached to the bill with little debate in Congress, weaken civil liberties and privacy rights that already were undermined by the Patriot Act that was approved shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks. The new legislation broadens prohibitions against providing material support to terror groups, makes it a crime to visit a terror camp that provides military-style training and allows the FBI to obtain secret surveillance warrants against ``lone wolf'' extremists not known to be tied to a specific terrorist group. It also makes terrorism hoaxes a federal crime and toughens penalties against people who possess weapons of mass destruction. The Bush administration pushed to include the law enforcement package in the intelligence measure to augment the Patriot Act, which expanded the government's surveillance and prosecutorial powers against suspected terrorists, their associates and financiers. ``We are pleased that Congress agreed that we still needed to improve our defenses,'' Justice Department spokesman Mark Corallo said. Critics say the provisions escaped close scrutiny because they were tucked into the massive bill creating a new national intelligence director. ``Overall, it's another threat to civil liberties in this country,'' said Charlie Mitchell, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. ``It's just a continuation of what the administration's been doing.'' ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html