[lit-ideas] Re: Popper and Grice: Naturalism and its Enemies

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 16:00:12 -0400

For the record, I see that McEvoy had already applied the Campbellian
(Cambellesque, Campbellist) notion of "selective retention" within a "nested
hierarchy" in connection with a pet philosophical theory: the Causal Theory of
Perception. Sorry about that!

Still looking for good anti-naturalistic references to criticise!

Cheers,

Speranza

----

In "Re: The Causal Theory of Perception", THIS FORUM, McEvoy: "The ‘
external world’ does not set the ‘detection-levels’ or the 'processing-form’
of
the perceptual apparatus except via the mechanism of ‘natural selection’
[Kant’s point when understood in the light of Darwinism: for example, the
link between light-waves and perceived colours is always contingently
dependent on the perceptual apparatus involved and not a necessary, intrinsic
function of light-waves themselves]. But in ‘natural selection’,
selection-from-without by the ‘external world’ is on an ‘internal world’ that
is
never ‘instructed’ by the ‘external world’ [‘instructed’ in the
Lamarckian or inductive sense]: the ‘internal world’ of experience is the
product
of ‘blind’ variation-from-within [leading to ‘selective retention’
within a ‘nested hierarchy’, as per D.T. Campbell in his “Evolutionary
Epistemology”]."



------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: