Social constructivism doesn't hold much of an esteem currently (doesn't hold much of a currency, estametly), nevertheless and nonwithstanding, Plato hisselfes held there's a social side to things in their constructs. As per below, and see also further clever authorial comments as per piss. From http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/cratylus.html Socrates: Well, now, let me take an instance;- suppose that I call a man a horse or a horse a man, you mean to say that a man will be rightly called a horse by me individually, and rightly called a man by the rest of the world; and a horse again would be rightly called a man by me and a horse by the world:- that is your meaning? Hermogenes: He would, according to my view. PS: Let's say there's three possibl positions as to regarding the relation language to man and their contexts- a) man makes up words, so that when gregory, say, arrives, i decide to hail him horsely "hey, horse!" b) words make up man, so that when gregory, say, arrives, words have decided that i hail him manly "hey, man!" c) man makes up words howee\ver not in conditions of his own makes, so that when gregory cums -- fnally -- i hail him. period. three and only three options. yrs. phatic (inquisitor)