JL, quoting Donal:
JLS' way with the issues is way too easy, and also seems confused, as explained below.------------------------------------------------------------------------
JL, speaking for himself (I think):
*From:* "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx> ** >It's full Russellian irony at play there. In a better format. Wittgenstein thinks that x cannot be said. But Wittgenstein said x. ---- Therefore, Wittgenstein is wrong.>
Therefore JL is wrong. The difference, in the /Tractatus/ (I think that to look for a said/shown distinction in the /Investigations/, is to follow a will-o'-the-wisp) is that between what can be said and what can only be shown. He doesn't /say/ anything that can't
be said. Robert Paul
