Quoting Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > --- On Wed, 17/8/11, Walter C. Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > There is no academic freedom, either in research or > > teaching without it. [I.e. tenure]. > > It would seem to follow, given that tenure has virtually disappeared here as > Judy says, that there is "no academic freedom" in Britain. Hmm. > > This is such a high horse to ride in defence in tenure that it think it might > be advisable to dismount. Skipper's recent posting has definitely caused a decline in our capacities for rational argument; we are reduced to erecting positions embedded only in vivid and enticing sexual metaphors. Re "Hmm:" I strongly suggest that Donal rethink her criteria of "advisability." For it doesn't "seem" anything. Donal's position is surely part of the problem here. Have the courage to admit that it follows, as day follows night, that there is no academic freedom in Britain. There, it has been asserted. Do the planets continue in their orbits? When faculty at, zum beispiel, the Institute of Education, University of London, are assessed according to the degree to which their research bears "impact" on practical policy matters and when they are criticized in government sponsored audits of their departments for the pursuit of "academic individualism" that fails to contribute to the coffers of silver of the University, you can be certain that Heather hasn't a prayer. Sir Walter of O MUN > > Donal > London > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011.php ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html