[lit-ideas] Re: 'P' For ...
- From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:07:55 -0400
Chris wrote: [PHILOSOPOETRY] simply puts everything before us,
and neither explains nor deduces anything.
- Since everything lies open to view
there is nothing to explain.
____
Could it be that philosophy gets its form from thought, and poetry gets
its thought from form?
If this seems pointlessly aphoristic, consider Joseph Brodsky's comment
that for a poet, "phonetics is semantics."
Eager to read Chris on the negative dialectic of philosophy and poetry.
Eric
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
