SS>CONTRARY TO COMMON WISDOM, Muslim SS> radicalism in the United Kingdom is not rooted in SS>grievance against British, American, Israeli, or SS>other Western policies. Nor is it a reaction to fear or SS>prejudice by non-Muslims. It originates in a specific SS>ideology imported to the country by two generations SS> of Sunni Muslim radicals from Pakistan This kind of comment's just so thoughtless and also so ignorant; so lacking in any knowledge of what's known about rebellion and in any real knowledge of the 7/7 bombers. (We have accounts, including a most detailed one that can I believe be independently corroborated, of the 7/7 people's anger at US/UK policy and the treatment of "Muslims" by "the West"; they showed videos, produced leaflets, etc., about this.) Also, the Pakistani population here has been the target of more racism than any other. (More here) http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/terrorism/july-dec06/pakistan_08-11.html Monocasual explanations of radicalism are just unhelpful. SS>British authorities could vet the appointment of clerics in SS>mosques and it would be helpful if they replaced imported SS>fanatics with reputable domestic scholars Overt "vetting" is of course not on but there's certainly a need for a new generation of Imams whose first language is British, partly so young Muslims can relate to them, and for them to replace imported clerics; Tariq Ramadan, who can't get into the US so is living in Oxford, argues precisely that. http://www.tariqramadan.com/article.php3?id_article=746&lang=en LH>I am not clear, despite Schwartz article, on what tipped LH> the Dobandis toward Jihad against the West. Schwartz seems to be saying that Deobandis changed from being peaceful SS>In the aftermath of the Afghan war of the 1980s -- I don't know who the "Saudi agents" are Incidentally you (in the US) will have more information than I do about the details of the current alleged plot as our papers can't publish anything that might prejudice the trial (the New York Times apparently barred UK readers from its story about police investigations). Judy ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 4:47 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Origins of British Jihad This is an interesting article. We knew, of course, that the Afghan Taliban were "theological students" in the Deobandi school, but I wasn't aware or had forgotten that the Deobandis had been influenced by the Wahhabs (I assume that is what Schwartz means by "Saudi agents," i.e., agents of Wahhabism). I knew that Maududi had his own school and there was some amalgamation. He was as militant as the Deobandi or Wahhabs in terms of fundamentalism. I am not clear, despite Schwartz article, on what tipped the Dobandis toward Jihad against the West. I expected to hear that Qutb or Maududi were in there some place but Schwartz doesn't mention them. So who were these Saudi agents and what were they agents of? Wahhabs claim that they don't advocate Jihad. If they were agents of Al Quaeda, all would be clear, but Schwartz doesn't say that. Lawrence ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html