[lit-ideas] Re: Ontilogical vs. Onticological
- From: John McCreery <mccreery@xxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 12:40:31 +0900
On 2004/07/06, at 12:30, Phil Enns wrote:
>
> Nope. It isn't a word and Heidegger certainly does not use it. It
> appears to confuse the ontic and the ontological, a distinction
> Heidegger goes to great lengths to maintain.
Phil, could you elaborate a bit. Read your previous post in which it
appears that ontic:ontological=things:Thing=beings:Being. How would
Heidegger answer the quesiton, "So what?"
John L. McCreery
The Word Works, Ltd.
55-13-202 Miyagaya, Nishi-ku
Yokohama, Japan 220-0006
Tel 81-45-314-9324
Email mccreery@xxxxxxx
"Making Symbols is Our Business"
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
