John McCreery wrote: "Would it be correct to say that Heidegger affirms the possibility of an unmediated apprehension of Being, once the confusion induced by purpose-filled desire is stilled?" For Heidegger there is no unmediated encounter of Being. In fact, it is not clear whether it makes any sense to talk of Being apart from beings. All knowledge and understanding is grounded in experience and so any experience of Being is necessarily a mediated experience. But this is perhaps too Kantian an answer. For the Heidegger of _Being and Time_, human beings are always human beings living in the world. The limits of understanding are the limits of human historicity and particularity. One does not hear sound waves, but a motorcycle or birds. For the later Heidegger, human beings are the ones to whom the world opens. Here the limits of understanding are the limits the world imposes on human beings. The warmth of a roaring fire in a fireplace in the cold of winter makes us feel restful and at home. This is Being reaching out to us, grasping us through things. Here, Being is the initiator and it is we who can merely respond. One image Heidegger uses is that of our always being in the footsteps of the gods who have already passed by. There certainly are ways of living that make it very difficult to hear Being in beings, but the path is not one of leaving behind things. Rather, following the path left behind by Being is always a matter of recognizing the participation of particular beings in Being. One aims not to leave the world, but rather to allow the world to unfold as truthfully as possible. Instead of turning away from the world, Heidegger would have us care about it. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html