For no apparent reason Irene has attacked pornography: "People today appear to prefer the smell of pine out of a bottle to real pine and other substitutes for reality (like porn)." Not only did she disparage pornography for no apparent reason, it came as a mere gratuituous parenthetical. I can't let such insult stand unremarked. Ergo: IN DEFENSE OF PORNOGRAPHY Flowers, after all, are but Nature's way of sticking her (and his) genitals in your face. And proudly. I'm sure I've sent this many times in the last 7 or 8 years, but I'm so proud of it that I'm always actively looking for opportunities to repost it (no riposte, required). Irene also comments on psychohistorians and trance states. I appreciate the fact that history is a maddening subject, but need she be so all inclusive in her denuciations. Sure, some historians are crazy as loons, but need she paint with such a broad brush? What about Toynbee, for Christsake? And I'm sure there are some others. I just wish Irene wouldn't be so sweeping in her generalizations. Mike Geary Memphis