Actually, even The Guardian articles and commentaries tend to be longer than those in New York Times. And, as it seems to me, much more thoughtful. O.K. --- Mirembe Nantongo <nantongo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A review of the Nisbett book Andreas cites can > be found below. It certainly does sound fascinating. > Question for John: what are the newspapers like in > Japan? Does straight reporting tend to be written > as it is here -- ie make it short, summarize the > story at the beginning, add the detail later for the > reader to take or leave -- or do articles tend to be > much longer than an average report in a U.S. paper > with important points sometimes appearing for the > first time deep within the body of the article? > What about newspaper layout? Are the pages broken up > into what we would consider visually manageable > chunks using headlines and graphics, or are there > vast stretches of closely-printed type largely > devoid of graphics? I'm trying to get used to Arabic > newspapers -- it's completely different ground and > seems to be catering to a very different kind of > thinking, and I don't mean political thinking. My > current simplest impressions are that the average > reader of Arabic newspapers > has both more time and is better at sustained > mental focus than the average US reader of English > newspapers, but am open to contradicting or > additional ideas. Best, MN > http://www.umich.edu/news/Releases/2003/Feb03/r022703a.html > > The geography of thought: How culture colors the way > the mind works > ANN ARBOR, Mich.-Cultural differences in the way the > mind works may be greater than most people suspect, > according to University of Michigan psychologist > Richard Nisbett, author of "The Geography of > Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think > Differently...and Why," just published by The Free > Press. "When you have a diverse group of people from > different cultures, you get not just different > beliefs about the world, but different ways of > perceiving it and reasoning about it, each with its > own strengths and weaknesses," says Nisbett, a > senior research scientist at the U-M Institute for > Social Research (ISR), the world's largest academic > survey and research organization. > In the book, Nisbett, who also heads the U-M Culture > and Cognition Program, discusses the substantial > differences in East Asian and Western thought > processes, citing experimental, historical, and > social evidence. His findings call into question the > long-standing psychological assumption that the way > the human mind works is universal. In the process, > he addresses such questions as: > > · Why did the ancient Chinese excel at algebra and > arithmetic, but not geometry? > > · Why do Western infants learn nouns more rapidly > than verbs, when it is the other way around in East > Asia? > > · Why do East Asians find it so difficult to > disentangle an object from its surroundings? > > "East Asian thought tends to be more holistic," says > Nisbett, who also heads the U-M Culture and > Cognition Program. "Holistic approaches attend to > the entire field, and make relatively little use of > categories and formal logic. They also emphasize > change, and they recognize contradiction and the > need for multiple perspectives, searching for the > 'Middle Way' between opposing propositions. > > "Westerners are more analytic, paying attention > primarily to the object and the categories to which > it belongs and using rules, including formal logic, > to explain and predict its behavior." > > In study after study described in the book, Nisbett > and colleagues from China, Korea, and Japan have > found that East Asians and Americans responded in > qualitatively different ways to the same stimulus > situation. In one experiment, designed to test > whether East Asians are more likely to attend to the > whole while Westerners are more likely to focus on a > particular object within the whole, Japanese and > Americans viewed the same animated underwater > scenes, then reported what they had seen. > > "The first statement by Americans usually referred > to a large fish in the foreground," says Nisbett. > "They would say something like, 'There was what > looked like a trout swimming to the right.' The > first statement by Japanese usually referred to > background elements: 'There was a lake or a pond.' > The Japanese made about 70 percent more statements > than Americans about background aspects of the > environment, and 100 percent more statements about > relationships with inanimate aspects of the > environment, for example, that a big fish swam past > some gray seaweed." > > In another experiment described in the book, Nisbett > and colleagues found that Americans respond to > contradiction by polarizing their beliefs whereas > Chinese respond by moderating their beliefs. In > still another study, the researchers found that when > making predictions about how people in general could > be expected to behave in a given situation, Koreans > were much more likely than Americans to cite > situational factors rather than personality > characteristics as reasons for someone's behavior. > > Social practices and cognitive processes support or > "prime" one another, Nisbett points out. For > example, "the practice of feng shui for choosing > building sites may encourage the idea that the > factors affecting outcomes are extraordinarily > complex," he notes, "which in turn encourages the > search for relationships in the field. This may be > contrasted with the more atomistic and rule-based > approaches to problem-solving characteristic of the > West. Consider, for example, the nature of > approaches to self-help in the West: 'The Three > Steps to a Comfortable Retirement' or 'Six Ways to > Increase Your Word Power.'" > > According to Nisbett, Asians move radically in an > American direction after a generation or less in the > United States. "But it might be a mistake to assume > that it's an easy matter to teach one culture's > tools to individuals in another without total > immersion in that culture," he says. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 11:52 AM > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: News via the web > > > > > Columbia Journalism Review (March/April 2004) > at > > > http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/2/beckerman-iraq.asp > > > > > The conversation just kept on leaping around > without any rational back and > > forth. Many of the Iraqis he talked to had a hard > time developing clear > > arguments, explaining themselves fully, and, as > Packer put it, understanding > > their own situation. Packer thinks this might be > related to the fact that > > the Iraqis were isolated and denied free will for > so long. A psychiatrist > > whom Packer quoted in the article explained that > Iraqis lack the power to > > experience freedom. > > > > This is so silly! Those reporters simply have no > idea what it is like to > > live outside of their own country. They can be in > Europe for ten years and > > they're still in the USA. > > > > There is a fascinating book: Geography of Thought, > by Richard Nisbett, that > > explores the differences in the way Americans and > Asians think, perceive, > > and express themselves. > > > > yrs, > > andreas > > www.andreas.com > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings > (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html