[lit-ideas] Re: Neo-Cantianism

  • From: "Walter C. Okshevsky" <wokshevs@xxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:34:24 -0230

This is unadulterated balderdash .. with a touch of horse feathers.  If Kant
really had Scots ancestry, why is there nothing in the authorized biographies
regarding his favourite whiskey? We well know he loved his drink at the "gaming
table" but I doubt it was single malt whiskey. From the views he expressed in
his published writings on the purpose of marriage (gays need not apply) and the
rights of women, prostitutes, servants, natives of the South Seas Islands, and
supporters of the Toronto Maple leafs,  I suspect he was a Kentucky Bourbon

Furthermore, it is eminently well documented that Kant's ancestry on his
mother's side was pure Cossack Russian. (Which explains his views on women.)
His original name, as appearing on his birth certificate issued by the Tserkov
of St Peter and St. Paul, is "Manyev, Mihail, Gavrilov, Illyatch, Lenin, 
Kantovsky."  Thanks to the Baltic Sea, there was a large Russian population
living in Koenigsburg at the time. These were emigrees from a Czarist Russia
void of any semblance of deliberative democracy. They were seeking freedom,
fraternity and equality in Prussia. The continuing and growing presence of this
population over historical time motivated and justified their liberation from
the Germans by the Russians. The rest is commentary.

Respectfully submitted,

Valodsya Okshevsky, PhD
Department of Soviet Historiography
University of Vladivostok
Mother Russia
A1B 3X8 

Quoting Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> From: Omar Kusturica omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx
> >I think that the puns on Kant's name (or surname) have been rather exhausted
> by now. >
> But, although having made the change to 'C', we haven't even got to playing
> with the vowel. Perhaps you are right.
> >I am both saying it and implying it.>
> Hm. This "both" may be untrue as a matter of the synthetic a priori (except,
> as Popper somewhere explains, there is no such thing as synthetic a priori
> knowledge in the sense of knowledge that is not merely conjectural but
> necessarily true).
> Btw, as Kant is Scottish may I claim him as Irish as the Scottish are just
> Irish who took a boat trip and didn't come back (hence Scots Gaelic is a
> derivative of Irish Gaelic). [David should be able to confirm this]. 
> Donal
> London

This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: