[lit-ideas] Re: NYTimes.com Article: Iraq-Bound Troops Confront Rumsfeld Over Lack of Armor
- From: Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lit-Ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:33:51 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
This is because Karl Rove and his buddies are redesigning the military.
They're moving toward less and less reliance on soldiers and more and more on
high tech equipment. It's the reason they originally proposed 50,000 soldiers
to take a country with. The Army laughed at them, so they raised it to 120,000
or so. It's still laughable. Smart bombs were supposed to do the job. The
results speak for themselves.
Not to mention that the guys wouldn't need anything if Fearless Leader was out
there fighting terrorists instead of breeding them.
Andy Amago
-----Original Message-----
From: carolkir@xxxxxxxx
Sent: Dec 8, 2004 5:36 PM
To: Lit-Ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] NYTimes.com Article: Iraq-Bound Troops Confront Rumsfeld
Over Lack of Armor
The article below from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by carolkir@xxxxxxxxx
Btw, veterans who need prosthetic devices now receive them. But they'd rather
have good armor.
ck
carolkir@xxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
