[lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:27:53 -0400
> [Original Message]
> From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 10/24/2005 12:34:41 AM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: NYT in the news again
>
> > A.A. There's point of view and then there's out and out
> > misinformation. The Times prints out and out misinformation.
>
> Examples, please. Same offer. Different fish, if you like. Your claim,
> remember, was that the Times _supports_ 'Bush and his war.'
>
Wow, you're tough. Examples of years long front page reporting about
something that never happened that smeared the president for no reason and
warranted a special prosecutor, and not stopping a rampaging reporter from
writing about mythical WMD as justification for invading Iraq (my example
of the Times supporting Bush and his war) isn't enough for you. Or having
better things to do instead of fact checking Jason Blair. I concede, you
win. Since I can't trust the Times enough to read them, I can't offer any
other examples. Looks like even if you did owe me a fish, given the
fantastical nature of reality at the Times, we'd have to settle for Tim
Burton's Big Fish anyway.
Andy Amago
> Robert Paul
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
