--- Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for posting the Canadian article, Andreas. > I think Bush is a jerk for trying to appease the > outraged Muslims, who clearly don't understand > pluralism. I was involved, briefly, with a row on a different list, all-US except for me, re Chris Ofili's use of elephant dung on a Madonna. When I explained, in true pluralist fashion, who Ofili was and why he painted as he did, the list owner -- who'd been trying to placate the baying mob -- was really pleased. But the bm were not convinced... Incidentally "pluralism" has many meanings but presumably in this context it implies a certain sensitivity to the possible feelings of others > This raises another more general problem: the > inability of the West to defend itself > intellectually and culturally. Be proud, do not > apologize. Do we have to go on apologizing for the > sins our fathers? Do we still have to apologize, > for example, for the British Empire, I've known many Indians; I've never felt myself called upon to apologise for the British Empire nor have they commented on my apparently to them memsahibness -- as a British person who thinks I sound posh might do and as they sometimes do do. The "apology" is more a national/institutional phenomenon. -- but in rural, mountainous Greece, a long time ago, I was made to feel unwelcome by some because of the betrayal of its Communist partisans after the War. (By 3-4 people, out of the many I met there.) Judy Evans, Cardiff ___________________________________________________________ Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now. http://www.yahoo.co.uk/blackberry ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html