[lit-ideas] Re: Muhammed and the Giant Peach
- From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:06:30 -0800
Is that to me? If so I don't get it.
Lawrence
-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of JUDITH EVANS
Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 6:36 PM
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Muhammed and the Giant Peach
And it causes me to wonder what you
> are reading.
_The Lancet_?
http://www.thelancet.com/
the piece was published there. There may also have been a
"guess"/"anticipation" but the people who did this study are researchers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:24 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Muhammed and the Giant Peach
> The 100,000 dead Iraqi civilians was the original guess of someone who
> anticipated that number, someone whose name escapes me. It has been
> repeated over and over. It isn't true. And it causes me to wonder what
you
> are reading.
>
> Lawrence
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
