[lit-ideas] Re: More places to nuke
- From: Paul Stone <pas@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:10:58 -0500
EY: So, yes, if Iran won't stop making nukes, take out their facilities.
If Canada went psychotic and started making nukes, take out their
facilities too.
The more apes with nukes, the more certain their use; the fewer apes with
nukes, the less certain their use.
It sounds like you are calling Canadians apes.
Actually, after a short research a few years back, I was astounded to find
out that Canada never did develop Nukes. I thought we had 'the bomb'. For
YEARS I was living with a false sense of security that we could take our
one bomb and do great damage to a small city somewhere within a few hundred
miles of Winnipeg's Portage and Main -- it's where Canada keeps all its
'central' secrets, like tax returns and college applications centres --
look out... um, um, um Bismarck... Yeah, yeah, that's it. I thought we
could bomb them back into the stoneage. It took time to adjust to the new
reality that we can't. Fortunately, it's not really necessary: those
badlands are already beautifully primitive. I'll give you ape-ish, but not
apes.
speaking no evil,
p
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
