LH: >>No, I find it hilarious that Leftist-Pacifists screamed when the government >>tried to take away suspected terrorists First Amendment Rights, but were >>appalled when the NRA objected to having these same suspects deprived of >>their Second Amendment rights. << One reason might be because no one has ever been killed due to the First Amendment, but a multitudinous plethora of deaths can be traced back to the Second Amendment's effects (or at least the interpretation that the 2nd Amendment protects gun ownership -- an interpretation I disagree with despite the latter-day conversions of Laurence Tribe and Sanford Levinson whom I greatly admire -- well, Tribe, anyway). Mike Geary Memphis ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 12:25 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Mike -- Not Real Astute But like I've said, I think we should crack down on these suspected terrorists even harder than we are; so I disagree with both the ACLU types and the NRA types when it comes to not cracking down on suspected terrorists. We are in a war but continue to hamper ourselves in fighting it. We have too many Surrender Monkeys getting in the way of fighting our enemies. Lawrence ------------Original Message------------ From: "Mike Geary" <atlas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, May-6-2007 8:10 AM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Mike -- Not Real Astute I do hate to disappoint you, Lawrence, but I did indeed read the whole article. I didn't respond to your challenge because I was too busy Europeanizing my neighbors with Leftist-Pacifist ideology. Sorry. As to the right to sell guns to terrorist suspects, let me ask you, don't you find it funny that by law you can be kept from flying on a plane because your name is on a list of suspected terrorists? Don't you find it hilarious that you can be sent to prison for life for giving a loan to someone suspected of being a terrorist? Or for hiring someone who is suspected of being a terrorist? Don't you find it marvelously droll that you can be disappeared and sent to a secret prison and tortured because someone suspects you of being a terrorist? But don't worry, it's still OK to sell a gun to a terrorist suspect and the good old NRA is determined to protect that right. Mike Geary Memphis ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 10:59 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Mike -- Not Real Astute What you say might be true if you like Mike, only read the headlines and not the whole article. Notice that I asked Mike for the reasons the NRA took the position they did and that he never answered. That should have been a clue for the astute. I looked up the article on CNN: http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/05/04/nra.terror.ap/index.html?eref=rss_us Since the Leftist-Pacifist position afflicts its holders with the inability to read long articles, here are a couple of brief paragraphs from the CNN article: 'In a letter this week to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, NRA executive director Chris Cox said the bill, offered last week by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-New Jersey, "would allow arbitrary denial of Second Amendment rights based on mere 'suspicions' of a terrorist threat. As many of our friends in law enforcement have rightly pointed out, the word 'suspect' has no legal meaning, particularly when it comes to denying constitutional liberties," Cox wrote.' I was hoping Mike would respond. I believe he was one of those who was outraged that the U.S. would infringe suspected terrorists first amendment rights by tapping their phones. I was hoping to ask him why he was outraged over the infringement of the First Amendment Right but not over the infringement of the Second. Lest anyone jump to the wrong conclusion about my own position, I would restrict both first & second amendment rights of those on the Terrorist Watch list. Lawrence ------------Original Message------------ From: "JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx Krueger" <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx> To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sat, May-5-2007 7:35 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: NRA -- Not Real Astute I find this very peculiar -- the NRA is aligned, typically, with the political party which has seen fit to wrench huge swaths of constitutional liberties and constitutional rights from American citizens carte blanche ... and yet it defends the notion that suspected terrorists should be allowed to arm themselves. Unreal. Absolutely Mad Hatter Alice down the Rabbit Hole Humpty Dumpty Jabberwocky unreal. Surreal. Impossible to believe. Julie Krueger On 5/5/07, Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > My favourite bit: > > '"As many of our friends in law enforcement have rightly pointed out, the > word 'suspect' has no legal meaning, particularly when it comes to denying > constitutional liberties," NRA executive director Chris Cox wrote.' Mr. Cox said that he would immediately begin a campaign to have the prison at Guantanamo Bay shut down. Robert Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html