I've already said that he was an anti-semite, so that is not in dispute. Having been an anti-semite, he might well have known other anti-semites too. That said, the theory that economic crises might have something to do with international banking interests doesn't strike me as a peculiarly wild or improbable one. O.K. On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Lawrence Helm <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And of course Mullins was apparently a good friend to Ezra Pound: > > > > *[from Wikipedia] In the late 1940s, when the poet Ezra Pound was > incarcerated in St. Elizabeth’s Hospital on treason charges against the US, > he corresponded with Mullins. In their correspondence, Mullins exclaimed > "THE JEWS ARE BETRAYING US", in a letter written on Aryan League of America > stationery. The two became friends and Mullins often visited the poet while > he was detained.[16] In his "Foreword" to The Secrets of the Federal > Reserve Mullins explains the circumstances by which he came to write his > investigation into the origins of the Federal Reserve System: "In 1949, > while I was visiting Ezra Pound ... [he] asked me if I had ever heard of > the Federal Reserve System. I replied that I had not, as of the age of 25. > He then showed me a ten dollar bill marked "Federal Reserve Note" and asked > me if I would do some research at the Library of Congress on the Federal > Reserve System which had issued this bill."[16]* > > > > *“Mullins told Pound that he had little interest in such a research > project because he was working on a novel. "My initial research" wrote > Mullins, "revealed evidence of an international banking group which had > secretly planned the writing of the Federal Reserve Act and Congress’ > enactment of the plan into law. These findings confirmed what Pound had > long suspected. He said, "You must work on it as a detective story."[16]* > > > > *“Mullins completed the manuscript during the course of 1950 when he began > to seek a publisher. Eighteen publishers turned the book down without > comment before the President of the Devin-Adair Publishing Company, Devin > Garrett, told him, "I like your book but we can't print it...Neither can > anybody else in New York. You may as well forget about getting the [...] > book published."[16]* > > > > *“Eventually the book was published by two other men who visited Pound > during that period, John Kasper and David Horton, under the title Mullins > on the Federal Reserve.* > > > > *“In Mullins on the Federal Reserve (1952), (the updated edition published > in 1983 was called Secrets of the Federal Reserve) Mullins argued that > there was a conspiracy among Paul Warburg, Edward Mandell House, Woodrow > Wilson, J.P. Morgan, Benjamin Strong, Otto Kahn, the Rockefeller family, > the Rothschild family, and other European and American bankers which > resulted in the founding of the U.S. Federal Reserve System. He argued that > the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 defies Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 5 of > the United States Constitution by creating a "central bank of issue" for > the United States. Mullins went on to claim that World War I, the > Agricultural Depression of 1920, the Great Depression of 1929 were brought > about by international banking interests in order to profit from conflict > and economic instability. Mullins also cited Thomas Jefferson's staunch > opposition to the establishment of a central bank in the United States.”* > > > > Ezra Pound has been an ongoing puzzle to me. He influenced a number of > poets during his era, but he strikes me as the poetic equivalent of > Heidegger. His writing is so difficult and obfuscated that any critic who > masters it is proud of his achievement and unwilling to denounce it as > being of poor quality. Pound’s economic theories as discussed in the > biographies I’ve read were considered a sign of his advancing madness. > > > > As to the Jews, I was once in a [Christian] Bible Study attended by a Jew > named Al who complained that with the ongoing belief in Jews capturing the > wealth of the world and being secretly influential, why could he never cash > in on that (apparently he would have if he could have)? He didn’t have any > relatives who were rich or powerful. He himself worked in the produce > department of a supermarket. It was a great mystery to him. > > > > Lawrence > > > > *From:* lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Omar Kusturica > *Sent:* Friday, February 13, 2015 1:13 AM > > *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [lit-ideas] Re: MH, with updated linkhttp:// > www.corriere.it/english/15_febbraio_09/heidegger-jews-self-destructed-47cd3930-b03b-11e4-8615-d0fd07eabd28.shtmling > > > > If you want to read an intelligent anti-Semite try Eustace Mullins, the > Secret History of the Jews. > > > > O.K. > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Correct, (directed at Omar Kusturica) the premises are false, I try > occasionally to accept that even false shit, like Heidegger’s utter > bullshit, can be adopted “for the sake of a discussion” > > > > Bestest > > > > > > *From:* lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Omar Kusturica > *Sent:* 12 February 2015 12:13 > *To:* lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [lit-ideas] Re: MH, with updated linkhttp:// > www.corriere.it/english/15_febbraio_09/heidegger-jews-self-destructed-47cd3930-b03b-11e4-8615-d0fd07eabd28.shtmling > > > > Well, I am not sure why this is posted as something worthy of attention, > but since it is... > > > > 1. The Jews in the early 20. century did not have a 'land', at least not > in the sense of nation-state, but they had a tradition. That tradition > makes claims about their history that are probably largely false - for > example, extensive archaelogical excavations at Jerusalem have failed to > turn up the supposed city of David and Solomon - but tradition they had. > They also had several languages of their own. > > > > 2. Genetical studies of Ashkenazi Jews have shown a fair amount of genetic > uniformity among them, probably not less than most modern nations have. > > > > 3. Until relatively recent times, the Jews were not particularly > technologically advanced. The most technologically advanced civilization on > the Earth until the 17th century (if not later) was China, which didn't > have too many Jews. > > > > 4. The Jews in late medieval Europe onward were connected with banking, > but this wasn't so much for reasons of culture or lack of it. The main > reason is that they were barred from possessing land in most medieval > European states (excepting Poland where they engaged in agricultural > occupations) and often also from artisan occupations (by the guilds; in > Ottoman empire, they worked as artisans).True, it helped that the Jewish > religion did not prohibit usury while medieval Christianity attempted to > prohibit it, although the Catholic Venice, Florence, and Genoa had bankers. > > > > Thus, Heigger's premises are largely false, although even if they were > true this would not in any way warrant the conclusion. > > > > O.K. > > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > http://www.corriere.it/english/15_febbraio_09/heidegger-jews-self-destructed-47cd3930-b03b-11e4-8615-d0fd07eabd28.shtml > > > > The link (above this line) was provided to me by colleagues. It gives the > article, in the English version, detailing how the self styled philosopher > of “being” and authetincity was starkly anti-Semitic. What is interesting > about the issue is not that yet another Nazi semi criminal is exposed, > after a century from the fact, nearly a century. What is interesting is > that this “Heidegger” has an argument. It goes as follows: to be able to > reach ‘being’ [don’t ask why anyone should reach a verb or be exposed to a > verb etc.] one needs a specified grounding. > > Step 1 the grounding is given by the Blut und Boden, the land, the > tradition, even more weirdly by a “language” (he calls language something > like his idiolect of Germanic descent, Greek is a language, nobody knows > why but Mongolian does not qualify, nor it can be a vehicle of thought > since thought is reserved for the master race) > > Step 2: the jews have no such thing (well, at that time there was no Eretz > Israel as nation-state in the tradition of political philosophy, there were > 5 jewish languages, the religious jews always claimed that they had a land, > it was given to them by GD etc. cfr Abraham in the “bible” and so forth, > but skip, the idea that there is a truth escapes the buffoon in lederhosen > since “truth” is revealed in the wood, “aletheia” and all of that) > > Step3 since the jews have no tradition in the relevant sense, they “do” > techniques (of dentistry, banking, some even films and music, not to > mention chemistry and physics) > > Step 4 the duder “knows” in his perverted brain that “technique” is not a > technique, it is a Gestell “ a systemic state of mind” > > Step 5 MH concludes glibly that “Technkik” killed the jews (Zyklon, > machine guns, showers that boil people to death, etc.) > > > > Step 6 and, then it is clear that “jews self-annihilated > > Honest colleagues that do not suffer the bizarre condition of “transfert” > (term adopted by Miller, French psychoanalyst who describe the interest and > fascination with MH as sexual in nature, in the form in which S. Freud > predicted) are invited to look at vol 97 of the “works” by this Heidegger, > available as of today. > > The author of the, linked, article, is a philosopher in Rome at “Sapienza” > (roughly “wisdom” the name of the university of Rome— > > > > > > bestest > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > <http://www.avast.com/> > > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > www.avast.com > >