JLS: > Anyway -- one has to give some consideration to some _quietness_ on the > list. People don't post _often_ but that's hardly the burden of the > 'prolific' posters. The recent case of P. Stone is just proof of that: there > he was > first complaining that not wanting to wade through my posts, he finds it > difficult to post. But that's not my fault. And now that he's found a topic > that interests him, there's nothing to stop him, is there. My only point in my previous discussion of your verbosity is that I found that I could not go through all the stuff, therefore, I couldn't comment intelligently on much because it may have already been covered by someone else, or you, yourself. That is what kept me quiet. Not 'your fault'. I simply didn't have the time. Regarding the thread of the "Aesthetics of Science" and other related discussions, you're right, it does interest me, and I CAN comment on it without sounding out of order because I, a) have followed it from the beginning and b) have read a lot of books about the topics. So... I'm not calling for your banning or censorship or anything like that. Just try to reign it in a bit on the 20 post days. paul ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html