[lit-ideas] Re: Lit-Ideas Conversions

  • From: "Lawrence Helm" <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 08:12:34 -0800

It's just you, Andy.  I read the dialogue between Flew and Habermas and saw
no evidence of hubris.  He was rather soft-spoken.  In fact they both were.

Flew's issue with Darwin has nothing to do with a prime mover.  It has to do
with Darwin's original life form being able to reproduce.  


Lawrence Helm

San Jacinto 


-----Original Message-----
From:  Andy Amago


Is it me, or is there a bit of hubris in some guy declaring that he has
inside information that proves there is a god?  And others really caring,
that's what gets me.  Talk about one sheep, however exalted, within the fold
saying he has *scientific evidence* that there is a god, and the rest run
after him. 


Regarding Darwin, I'm no Darwin expert, but whether or not Darwin believed
there was a prime mover is irrelevant.  His theory of evolution works.


Pardon my French here, but I'm ashamed to be a member of this deep thinking
society called the human race.  Well, gotta go, gotta find me a head sheep
to tell me what's on the agenda in the universe today ...





















No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.2 - Release Date: 12/13/2004

To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: