Quoting Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>: snip > > Eric: We know there is God as (a) a literary > character in various scriptures; (b) a product of > our imaginations; (c) a paradox of reason [If > Walter hasn't yet entered his castle, he could > explicate Kant's Critique of Pure Reason to > describe how theological reason gets mugged by its > antinomy in a dark alley.]; and (d) a word. snip It's not a castle, it's a Fortress. And if Walter weren't in his Fortress discussing the nature of imperatives, apologies and fundamental norms of appropriateness, civility, hypothetical imperatives and the nature of sensibility as embodied by the Impartial Spectator with Adam Smith, Dave Hume and Liz Anscombe, he would tell you that all present inhabitants of his Fortress comprehend babkis what The Master was up to in his First Critique. Dave claims the text is very repetitive, often contradictory and not grounded in sound empiricist premises. Adam asks "What's with the 'A's and 'B's dude??" and Liz believes the entire project is based on a terrible mistake. But this was a counterfactual statement and so it never happened. Walter O. Fortress of Solitude 53 Lenin Prospekt Somewhere in the Arctic Circle > > John: Backea braqeqce lcaeve gprawee. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html