I meant "more pacifistic." They did disagree on the use of force. -----Original Message----- From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Omar Kusturica Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:02 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Islam, Israel and the Code of the West Lawrence, By characterizing the Haganah as pacifists, you have demonstrated some ability as a comedian. Re your other comments, se the article titled "US hawks smell blood": http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/HG19Ak01.html --- Lawrence Helm <lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Simon: It doesn't mean I would support anything. I > have a position of > Militant Islam. You haven't really proved the Likud > predecessor was a > terrorist organization any more than you could prove > that the French > Resistance during WWII was a terrorist organization. > Who said the Irgun was > a terrorist organization? Someone from the Haganah? > That's why there was a > split. The pacifists didn't like the activists. > Big deal. It was a > different time in which nothing existed that > corresponds to a Militant > Islamic Terrorist organization. But so what? Why > should I voice opinions > about matters I'm not interested in to suit > someone's deviant interests? > > > > I continue to believe that Militant Islamic nations > should be defeated, and > the threat of militant Islamic terrorist > organizations should be sanitized. > > > > > Lawrence > > > > _____ > > From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Simon Ward > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 4:31 PM > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Islam, Israel and the Code > of the West > > > > I feel fine Lawrence. It's a bit warm here, sticky > almost, but apart from > that, I feel fine. > > > > However, I'm not convinced that your position, what > you mean, is supportable > since it implies that you would support terrorist > methods providing you > thought the cause was right. > > > > I also think that you were ready to defend Irgun > until it became obvious > that they were terrorists. Now you're convinced that > they were terrorists > you're miffed and want to restrict the discussion to > militant islam. In > itself, that precludes my first point, but it also > suggests that you don't > want to consider it because while you support the > cause (an Israeli State) > you don't approve of the methods that attained it > (terrorism). > > > > For many, that provides Israel's inherent > contradiction; it was a state that > was founded on terrorism but which now abhors it. > That's what I think by the > way. > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Lawrence <mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Helm > > To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:18 AM > > Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Islam, Israel and the Code > of the West > > > > Do you get to say what I mean or do I? I'd like to > think that I know what I > mean. I am not talking about all the groups of the > past that might > technically fit someone's definition. I am talking > about Militant Islam. I > don't need to provide an all inclusive statement > each time I say > "Terrorist." It should be understood, and is, that > I mean "Militant Islamic > Terrorist." > > > > Militant Islamic Terrorist organizations should be > exterminated. There, do > you feel better now? > > > > Lawrence > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html