--- Andy Amago <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The way you say it, or the way I'm hearing it, makes > Liberal Democracy, especially coupled with Marxist > Liberal Democracy, sound pejorative. I am NOT a > Marxist, but I think it's safe to say that Marxism, > like Christianity, has never been tried. I'd go along with that Judy can correct me, but I think England > today has a form of "Marxism" (even possibly > including ownership of the means of production in > the form of nationalized industries). Not Marxism but some of it rested on the Labour Party's Clause 4 (now abolished by Blair?, renounced anyway some years before that): >>>>>>>>>> 'To secure for the producers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry, and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible, upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry and service.' <<<<<<<<<<< Thatcher, Major, and Blair have done away with most of that, simply for ideological reasons and at a cost to consumers (prices, bureaucracy, safety) and so to the nation. But we don't have unbridled capitalism, thank goodness. Judy Evans, Cardiff ___________________________________________________________ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html