[lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
- From: "Irene" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 22:04:10 -0500
> [Original Message]
> From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 12/9/2005 9:51:22 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Interpretation and Elision
>
> It wrote:
>
> "I'm a little surprised though, since Andy wasn't exactly your favorite
> person. I would think you'd be glad to see him go."
>
>
> Quite wrong. 'Andy' may have annoyed me a great deal but 'he'
> contributed a lively voice to the list, and for that I respected 'him'.
> I come to this list looking for interesting conversation, not opinions I
> agree with. I much prefer 'Andy' to 'Irene' since I much prefer someone
> who has the integrity of their convictions as opposed to someone who I
> cannot trust. I can't trust 'Irene' so I would invest little energy in
> a conversation with 'her'.
>
I agree. Andy was a lot more fun than dull Irene. But just think, you
could be talking to Anderson Cooper. Would you like that?
> Phil Enns
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
