Perhaps two different meanings of the word 'humour' confuses the issue. There is the activity that aims to create a specific response in an audience, and then there is that specific response. One can recognize that someone is engaged in the activity of humour, but not find the joke humorous. I can see a particular response in others, but I don't have that response. We can also recognize situations where someone is not trying to engage in humour, but find the situation humorous. Something being humorous, then, is independent of the fact of there being someone engaged in the activity of humour. One can say 'He was being humorous, but I failed to recognize the humour' if 'being humorous' refers to the activity of humour. One cannot say 'I found his jokes humorous but didn't get the humour'. Sincerely, Phil Enns Indonesia ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html