Ban astrology? Next thing you know, someone will want to ban economics and management consulting.... John On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Mike Geary <jejunejesuit.geary2@xxxxxxxxx>wrote: > So is this or isn't it the Age of Aquarius? > > Mike Geary > Memphis > > > > > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> I readily take the point, palma, that there is a fundamental difference >> between selling quack pills masquerading as effective medicines and seeking >> payment for some astrological prediction, and that the newspaper report does >> not go into detail on the relevant law and its purpose, and it may well be >> that the court's decision is not based on any strict analysis of what is >> "science" but on whether astrology should be excluded from the harms that >> the law is there seeking to prevent, and therefore the finding it is a >> "science" for the purpose of the law under consideration may be deemed >> correct as a matter of purposive construction and on grounds of public >> policy. The point that Popper was not consulted because he is dead is also >> well-made, though I maintain they could still have consulted his works which >> are available in all good bookshops. >> >> Donal >> Bottom Club 2 Top Club 1 >> Yes, Mr. Ritchie, by Jove >> >> --- On Sat, 5/2/11, palma <palma@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > as you can tell, it is not the indian >> > women of your camp (what is your "camp"? do you live in >> > india?) >> > who're idiots >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, >> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html >> > > -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wordworks.jp/