[lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 16:46:31 -0800
On Feb 5, 2011, at 12:19 PM, Donal McEvoy wrote:
>
> Bottom Club 2 Top Club 1
Proof that God exists!
David Ritchie,
Portland, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- cblists