[lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 11:37:09 -0800
On Feb 5, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Donal McEvoy wrote:
> Arsenal throwing away a 4-0 half-time lead at Newcastle.
>
> Donal
>
>
We wuz mugged by the moons of Jupiter?
Possibly?
David Ritchie
putting in for new star signings in
Portland, Oregon
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted - David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Mike Geary
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- David Ritchie
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- John McCreery
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- palma
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- Donal McEvoy
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Indian Courts rule astrology is a science, Popper not consulted- cblists
